← All posts Advocacy

What we tell regulators about the 60-day rule

Raw-milk aging rules come up in nearly every comment period we file. Here's the plain version of what the rule actually requires, and what the federation is asking regulators to consider.

Members ask us about the raw-milk aging requirement more than almost any other single rule, and it's worth restating plainly, because the shorthand version people repeat at conferences isn't always quite right. Federal rules allow cheese made from unpasteurized milk to move across state lines only if it has been aged a minimum of 60 days at a specified cold temperature and is clearly labeled as unpasteurized. Pasteurized cheese doesn't carry that restriction. The 60-day clock is the whole basis on which raw-milk cheese gets to be a national product instead of a state-by-state one, and it's been the standard for decades.

That's the rule. What we hear from members is less about the number itself and more about how it interacts with everything else in a small creamery's food-safety plan — record-keeping burdens, testing costs, and the reality that a 60-day hold ties up cave space and cash for two months before a wheel can even be offered outside the home state.

A recall reported in the trade press this month, tied to Listeria findings in an aged raw-milk cheese, is a reminder of why the rule gets scrutiny in the first place and why the federation doesn't treat it as a box to check once a year and forget. Every time a recall like that runs, a wave of members writes in asking whether the rule is about to change. It usually isn't, but the question is fair, and we'd rather answer it directly than let a headline sit unanswered in a member's inbox.

What we're actually asking for

When the federation files comments in a rulemaking or interstate-shipment proceeding, we are not asking anyone to shorten the aging window — that's not a position the association takes, and it isn't ours to weigh in on the underlying food-safety science. What we do ask for, consistently, is clearer and more consistent guidance on what documentation satisfies the requirement, so that a small producer doesn't have to guess at a state inspector's expectations that differ from a federal one. Several members who ship across two or three state lines have told us the inconsistency costs them more time than the aging period itself.

We also push, where we can, for the federal safety regulator to publish worked examples — a sample log, a sample lot-coding scheme — rather than leaving smaller creameries to reverse-engineer what a larger producer's compliance department already has in place. That's a request about clarity, not about loosening the underlying standard, and it's the distinction we lead with every time a member asks whether the federation is trying to relax the rule. We aren't, and we wouldn't file comments to that effect even if a member asked us to.

There's a second, quieter ask in most of our filings: better coordination between the federal record and the state-level inspection programs that actually visit a creamery's aging room. A producer can be in full compliance with the federal 60-day standard and still fail a state visit over a documentation format the state inspector prefers but the federal rule doesn't require. That mismatch is avoidable, and it's the kind of thing a trade association is well positioned to flag because we see it across dozens of creameries rather than just one.

If you want a voice in this

The Food Safety Committee tracks open comment periods relevant to raw-milk cheese and posts a plain-language summary before each deadline, along with a template members are free to adapt for their own submission. If you make raw-milk cheese and ship it across state lines, that committee is the fastest way to find out when the next window opens, and our Food Safety & HACCP Certificate course covers the record-keeping side of the 60-day requirement in more depth than we can fit here. If you've had your own run-in with a documentation mismatch between a state and a federal inspector, the committee wants to hear about it — those specifics are what make our comment letters useful rather than generic.


The International Cheese Federation (ICF) and More Cheese are entirely fictional. This post is demonstration content created for MemberJunction. All people, organizations, events, courses, certifications, figures, and quotations in it are invented, and nothing here represents a real association, a real business, a real person, or real professional advice.

raw-milkfood-safetyadvocacyinterstate-shipment

More from the blog

All Advocacy posts →