← All posts Advocacy

Interstate shipment is still stuck, and so are we

State-level rulemaking on raw-milk products moved again this spring, but the interstate shipment question members keep raising with us is still unresolved.

A few states moved on raw-milk permitting and testing rules again this spring, and each time one does, the same question lands in our inbox: does this change anything for a wheel that crosses a state line? The honest answer, this week as in most weeks, is no — not directly. Interstate sale of raw-milk cheese aged under the federal minimum is still governed at the federal level, and state permitting changes, however welcome to producers inside those borders, don't reach a shipment once it leaves the state.

That gap is exactly what our advocacy work on interstate shipment has been aimed at for a while now, and it's worth being plain about where it stands: unresolved, still moving slowly, and still worth every letter members send.

Why it's still stuck

Federal food-safety attention this spring has stayed focused on labeling and traceability requirements rather than opening the aging-standard question members most want addressed. That's not a rejection of the interstate shipment issue — it's more that it hasn't reached the top of the queue, and issues that aren't at the top of a regulator's queue don't move without sustained, visible pressure from the people affected by them.

That's where our petition and letter-writing pushes come in, unglamorous as they are. Every signature and every submitted comment goes into the same file the standards side of federal reviews draws on when deciding what's worth revisiting. It's slow. It's also the only version of this process that has ever produced a rule change in our members' favor, and we don't want anyone to read "still stuck" as "not worth doing."

Tom Reyes has been filing comments and signing on to these letter campaigns for close to a decade — more consistently than almost any other member in our records, and almost entirely on raw-milk aging rules and interstate shipment. He isn't on a committee and doesn't attend our conferences most years. He just reads every comment period that touches his creamery's ability to ship, and he answers nearly all of them. When we asked him once why he keeps at it, he said something like: nobody else is going to write the letter about his particular wheel, so it has to be him.

That's not a rare instinct among our members, but Tom's is a useful reminder of the scale this actually happens at. Individual advocacy actions don't look like much next to a shift in Class III pricing or a change in federal order math. They add up the same way compound interest does — quietly, and only if you keep making the deposit.

What we're asking this month

If interstate shipment affects how you sell, the fastest way to add your voice is the standing petition on our advocacy page — it takes less time than reading this post. If you've shipped raw-milk product across a state line and had a specific problem because of the current rule, a short written account of that experience is worth more to the review process than a signature alone; email the Membership & Outreach Committee and we'll route it to the right file.

We'll flag it here the moment the federal review calendar moves. Until then, the same instruction stands as always: keep the letters coming.


The International Cheese Federation (ICF) and More Cheese are entirely fictional. This post is demonstration content created for MemberJunction. All people, organizations, events, courses, certifications, figures, and quotations in it are invented, and nothing here represents a real association, a real business, a real person, or real professional advice.

advocacyinterstate-shipmentraw-milkpolicy

More from the blog

All Advocacy posts →